Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, that is one worker who keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely quiet man. He just moved in extremely calmly by having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers by them at that time and additionally they had been terrified,’ he added.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for 6 months for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of those two tales is a bit more frightening, as the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a person in the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm regarding the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over pokies online more chilli one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is regarding the theory that neighboring communities would be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of prospects who have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that might be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required if the casinos and local governments can’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. In other words, the casino might have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city so as to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley have not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six of this eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with only two coming out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of wagering outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there is concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with gambling shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner of this Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is not mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season their workplace had been accused of modifying their Wikipedia page showing evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.